HERE 12 Reasons To Question The Truthfulness Of Kavanaugh’s Accuser!! | Trending News

2018-09-20T01:48:00+00:00 September 20th, 2018|


“HERE 12 Reasons To Question The Truthfulness Of Kavanaugh’s Accuser!!” video transcription

[/fusion_text]

welcome to the wake up channel please press subscribe button for more videos and turn on the notification to the new video we upload them every day twelve reasons to question the truthfulness of Cavanaugh’s accuser she’s accused Kavanaugh of forcing himself on her at a party in the early 1980s when she was 15 and he was 17 here’s her allegation for the Washington Post while his friend washed she said Kavanaugh pinned her to a bet on her back and groped her over her clothes grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it when she tried to scream she said he put his hand over her mouth I thought he might inadvertently kill me said Ford now a 51 year old research psychologist in Northern California he was trying to attack me and remove my clothing ford said she was able to escape when Cavanaugh’s friend and classmate at georgetown preparatory school mark judge jumped on top of them sending all three tumbling she said she ran from the room briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house so is it true in favor of Ford’s accusation she reportedly told her therapist the version of this story and 2012 and her husband likewise says she told him to at the suggestion of her attorney she also successfully took a polygraph test in early August there are also reasons to question for its allegation here are the top 12 12 for its therapists notes of the incident don’t match her current version of the story for it says Cavanaugh pinned her down and attempted to take off her bathing suit in the room also she said was his friend mark judge Ford first told this story in 2012 about 30 years later to her therapist during couples therapy the therapists notes from that session don’t name Brett Kavanaugh and also report Ford sad four men were in the room for it says the discrepancy is the fault of the therapists 11 Ford by her own admission has a hazy recollection of the incident despite telling the Washington Post this incident so traumatized her she’s been in recovery ever since she also admitted not recalling the incident specifically she doesn’t remember the year it happened but believes it occurred in 1982 when she was 15 and Cavanaugh was 17 she does not recall where the incident occurred only that it was at a house in Montgomery County MD she forgets whose house it was and how she got there she forgot whether Cavanaugh and judge were already upstairs when she went up or if they came up after her she also forgot how she got home that night 10 some of Ford’s students suggest she is vengeful and is mentally unbalanced on rate my professor for its students give her generally negative reviews with some going so far as to call her the worst teacher ever and that something is wrong with her she’s also said to hold grudges against students who somehow cross her christine ford is the worst educator i have ever experienced one student wrote avoid taking her class and avoid any interaction with this person I feel like she has something wrong with her and I am surprised no one has caught this also avoid Fullerton’s and ass w program as long as she is there professor for it is unprofessional blacks appropriate filters and I am honestly scared of her another in a 2014 review the student reported receiving an 8 in her class despite his or her displeasure with the professor she’s made comments both in class and in emails if you cross her he will be on her bad side I fear to think of the poor clients that had to deal with her while she got her MSW and her LCSW absolutely the worst teacher I ever had nine polygraph tests are so unreliable they’re inadmissible in court polygraph tests do not have any reliable capacity to detecting the veracity of a statement and are therefore inadmissible and criminal proceedings except in rare circumstances where both parties agree here’s how the law firm Rodan and Nicholson explained polygraph tests the machines measure a person’s biological processes to determine if they are becoming stressed out during interrogations factors such as an increase in blood pressure or heart rate are measured while these may be indicators that a person is lying they may also simply indicate that a suspect is feeling pressurized by the interrogation even if they are telling the truth 8 the allegation wasn’t released until Cavanaugh’s earrings were over for its story first surfaced in July when she sent a letter to her congressman representative Anna Eshoo Democrat California that letter was forwarded to Senator Dianne Feinstein in late July for recent Feinstein has not disclosed she kept the letter secret until after Cavanaugh’s hearings concluded missing repeated opportunities to question Cavanaugh directly by releasing the letter after the hearings concluded Cavanaugh is effectively robbed of an opportunity to defend himself directly in a public forum Feinstein has suggested she sought to simply honor Ford’s request for confidentiality yet that doesn’t explain her not bringing the matter up during the hearings as she could have left the accuser nameless 7 Kavanagh has successfully passed 6 FBI background checks Brett Kavanaugh has already served in many of the highest levels of government almost all of which required the extensive FBI background checks he passed all of these with belt incident as Senator Grassley wrote Monday judge Kavanagh has undergone six FBI full field investigations from 1993 to 2018 no such allegation resembling the anonymous claims of her surfaced 665 woman who knew Calvin on high school have vouched for his character unlike other recent Hashmi to accusations there are no similar stories from other Cavanaugh contemporaries indeed it’s the opposite after Ford’s anonymous allegations surfaced a group of women who knew Kavanagh in high school signed a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee collectively serving as a character witness for Cavanaugh through the more than 35 years we have known him RIT has stood out for his friendship character and integrity in particular he has always treated women with decency and respect that was true when he was in high school and it has remained true to this day five the only witnesses deny her allegation besides Ford there were only two other named parties rep Cavanaugh himself and his friend mark judge both have issued vehement denials Ford where the Washington Post also named two others who were in attendance that night the Washington Post said neither party responded to requests for comment for the haze of alcohol by Ford’s own telling she was drinking the night of the incident she says Cavanaugh was heavily intoxicated by did not indicate her own level of sobriety did alcohol affect her perception of the incident that night or her memory of it the Washington Post account does not describe her her level of intoxication when the incident occurred three deleted her public social media accounts before revealing herself as the Washington Post reported four deleted all of her public social media before she came forward making it difficult to see the advocacy in partisanship she was engaged in the time leading up to her making her allegation public of course for it may simply value her privacy but the act of deleting her public postings will inevitably make some wonder what she didn’t want seen to for it may have an unrelated grudge against Cavanaugh as his mother once a circuit court judge ruled against Ford’s parents in August 1996 Christine lacy Ford’s parents Paula and Ralph blase II were foreclosed upon Cavanaugh’s mom Martha was then serving as a judge on the Montgomery country Circuit Court and she ruled against Christine for its parents information about the cases available here this is more significant in the context of Ford students reporting she harbors grudges against those who cross her one Ford is a Democrat who donates to left-wing causes attended the Trump Mars for science and previously signed an open letter challenging Trump’s porter policy Ford is a political activist who has made dozens of donations to left-wing causes according to open secrets she has made more than 60 donations to liberal causes with almost four dozen to the pro-abortion group emily’s list alone ford also donated to the DNC Hillary Clinton more than ten times Bernie Sanders and a progressive organizing group act blue Ford likewise attended the anti-trump march for science where she wore a hat knitted like a human brain but inspired by the feminist hats worn at the Women’s marches ford also added her name to an open letter from health professionals who argued the US border policy resulting in temporary separation of some families was harmful to children’s development the letter titled America’s health professionals appealed to Trump administration and families operation at border immediately argued thousands of medical voices from across the United States have joined forces with physicians for Human Rights PHR to urge the Trump administration to immediately halt the separation of migrant and his Sodom seeking children from their parents at the us-mexico border it should not be US policy to traumatize children and especially not as a form of indirect punishment of their parents forced separation of children and parents especially in connection with the detention of a parent can constitute an adverse childhood experience which research links with disrupted neural development resulting in social emotional and cognitive impairment and even negative intergenerational effects what do you think comment below the video share if you find this information useful share if you agree subscribe channel for more video channel bring you the truth thanks for watching




Watch the video about
“HERE 12 Reasons To Question The Truthfulness Of Kavanaugh’s Accuser!!”